Wednesday, June 10, 2009
Writing Critically, part deux
Monday, June 8, 2009
Lit Crit Essay 2
Due: Monday, June 15, 2009 by noon, either in mailbox or by e-mail
Write a literary analysis of two stories reading during the Spring term. At least one of the stories must be from second half of the quarter.
- You will want to have a thesis statement that clarifies what in your comparison you are focusing on showing to audience.
- As always, provide textual evidence that supports thesis, and explain how evidence does so.
- Cite the page number of all quoted, paraphrased or summarized text from the stories at the end of each citation.
- Provide Work Cited Page
- For longer quotes (four lines or more) follow special MLA formatting guidelines
- Provide a title that clarifies thesis and subject matter – be creative, grab reader’s attention. This will be part of essay grade.
- Avoid use of “I” in essay, as “I” is NOT the subject. The use or non-use of first person has nothing to do with “my opinion.” Use of this rhetorical structure has to deal with subject of writing. “I” is not the subject. The stories and the writers are.
The essay must be a minimum of three (3) complete pages, double-spaced, using a 12-point standard font, with a maximum length of five (5) pages.
Final Prompt:
Coming of age? Death enter your life? Experience a first love? Broken down by love? At your mid-life? How does a man act? What’s a woman to do? Oh, brother! Oh, sister! Mi familia! Ma famille! – These questions inhabit common themes dealt with in the stories we write and the stories we read. Whether one speaks English, French or Spanish, or Gaelic or Swahili; whether living B.C. or A.D. – our humanity drives us to explore these human themes again and again…
Choose two stories we’ve read this quarter that deal with a familiar theme. Compare and contrast how the individual author of each story deals with the theme through language and subject matter.
In addressing the language of each piece tone, syntax, choice of images, and word choice are some of the options you may analyze. In addressing subject matter tone, plot, characters and setting are some of the things worth discussing.
Also, in discussing these texts, you are allowed to articulate your idea by connecting ideas to larger world; by putting the piece in context with other texts that deal with same themes (which includes putting one text into context by how it relates to comparison text).
Please be advised: spend your time developing your thesis statement throughout paper rather than trying to address too many points. An effective argument has direction and addresses the thesis from various angles. Quality of argument is weighed more than quantity of ideas. Make sure to connect and explain how all of your smaller points relate back to thesis statement.
Monday, June 1, 2009
Reading for Wed., 6/3:
Sincerely, Chris : )
Sunday, May 31, 2009
Mimicking the Artist 2 (30pts): One
Friday, May 29, 2009
Reader Response #4 (50pts): 6/1
Wednesday, May 27, 2009
Reading for Friday, May 29th:
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
For Friday, 5/22 and Wednesday:
Friday, May 15, 2009
In-class prompt (35 – 40 minutes):
Both “The Lady with the Dog” and “An Adventure in Paris” involves adultery that takes place (or starts) in a city outside the main character’s hometown. Choose one of the stories to focus on answer “Using evidence from the text, why does the character have an affair within the story, and what role does the visiting city play in their reasons? Be specific, and also explain how the mental state of the character changes by the story’s end.”
- Have a clear thesis statement that answers the two questions of prompt
- Use at least 4 quotes from different parts of story
o Do not just quote, but properly cite page number
o Also, after quotations, re-state in your own words, with analysis, the significance of the quoted material in answering your thesis
- Allow for two to three main points (topic sentences) based off of your thesis statement…
- Take all of the time given, as this will be graded. Also, this is a good practice for other analytical essays!
Reading for Monday, 5/18 and RR#2 announcement
Wednesday, May 13, 2009
In-class Writing Practice
- We will write list on board: ...
2. Come up with some questions that ask something about the themes as they pertain to story and, perhaps, the characters, the plot, or another literary element in text.
3. Pull out some relevant quotes from the story…
4. Make some claims that from the thematic questions created in class… and then use quotations as support…
- When you write an essay, I always keep in mind:
o I look at each paragraph as a small essay!!! One paragraph=one idea
Monday, May 4, 2009
Theme Week: dissecting a story for theme
Discussion Questions to bring out thematic analysis:
1. How does the title indicate what the story may be thematically about? How do we see the title being played out within the story on a general level?
- Story is about how one handles their grief
- There are multiple ways in which people handle their grief
- Allows you to focus on the idea of “managing” grief and what that means!
2. Summarize the major event in the story, who was all affected and how does our main character, Shaila, seem to be dealing? Then compare and contrast the different ways characters react.
3. Going back to plot, what is happening in the first scene of the story, and why might Mukherjee start the story with this scene? What details help us in those first introduction paragraphs allow us to understand Shaila’s mindset?
4. Discuss the differences and similarities amongst how Shaila, Kusum and Dr. Sharma
5. Describe the different cultural reactions that are taking place in the story. What is a thematic significance of these differences?
6. For above, how do the Irish treat the victims? How do the Canadians? Dissect some of the different parts where we see the interaction of two cultures, and how does that help us understand the story’s themes more clearly?
7. How does Shaila change by the stories end, and what causes her change? Explain how that affects how we read the title of the story – the thematic importance of the title?
8. If we haven’t, dissect some of the language used.
9. What about the scene where Shaila is helping out and reflects on her Indian culture?
10. What else do we need to discuss? What did we miss?
Thursday, April 30, 2009
Writing Critically (on literature, and in general)
Monday, April 27, 2009
Mimicking the Artist 1
due: Friday, May 1 2009
Guidelines:
- 1-2 page short story (perhaps one brief scene from a larger piece) that serves as a creative homage to a writer you admire (or don’t!).
- Can be an author we’ve read, or a writer you’ve read and feel you understand their literary techniques/writing style.
- Imitate/parody the author’s writing style – the literary device(s) that make them famous (plot, characters, language/dialect/syntax/word choice, dialogue, theme, symbolism, suspense, allegory/ etc.)
o At the top, on left-hand side, head your paper with:
• Your name
• Mimicking _______ (insert their name)
• ID story and/or aspect of their writing you’re mimicking
Modernize the stories (or sci-fi them), update the language and setting, etc. If an author is known for thick language or dialect of their time and culture – use the dialect of our time and culture. However, be true to who you are, and consider if your language might offend your audience! In other words, do your best not to have flat characters (stereotypes) unless this is part of the authorial imitation.
The ubiquitous advice to burgeoning writers (even if forced to write!) is to be honest, and “write what you know.” However, leaving the statement at that is dangerous. Without context, it tells you to write with an authority of having the answers, when this is simply not the case What that statement really means is this:
Write from the reality and experiences of your life; what have you been through, what people in your life have gone through; what is the world you live in; what themes of humanity obsess you? What do you know, but not really know? What is worth exploring based on you and your experience?
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Schedule Reminders/Clarifications:
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
For Friday, 4/17:
Due: Friday, April 17th
Atwood v. Oates
Here is your first written chance (in this course) to turn personal preference into an analytical response.
Which story, of the last two read for Plot Week, do you prefer? Both authors are considered major writers of the 20th century; both, that is to say, have their literary merit, and are worth analysis.
So, focusing mostly on plot and its effects on the characters, what parts of your favored story – upon a close reading – makes the story worth sharing with readers 50 years from now?
Use specific detail from story. Quote lines from the text and explain in your own words how you understand these lines operating in the story – how do they make the story?
Guidelines: 12pt, Times New Roman (Cambria is okay); 1-2 pages double-spaced.
This will serve as a “diagnostic” as well as your first grade.